![house oversight house oversight](https://cdn.abcotvs.com/dip/images/2032635_052417-ktrk-city-boarding-house-oversight-img.jpg)
The findings reflect a sharply politicized national debate that has consumed local school boards and, increasingly, state capitols. Among Democrats, those numbers are reversed. Still, the poll from the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy and The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research shows stark differences between Republicans and Democrats who want to see schools make adjustments.Ībout 4 in 10 Republicans say teachers in local public schools discuss issues related to sexuality too much, while only about 1 in 10 say too little. Overall, Americans lean slightly toward expanding - not cutting back - discussions of racism and sexuality, but roughly 4 in 10 say the current approach is about right, including similar percentages across party lines. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., Chairman of the Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.Īmericans are deeply divided over how much children in K-12 schools should be taught about racism and sexuality, according to a new poll released as Republicans across the country aim to make parental involvement in education a central campaign theme this election year.
#House oversight for free#
“Book censorship wrecks a healthy environment for free inquiry and learning, and I have been amazed by the widespread response we have received across the country to our hearing from students, parents, teachers, and authors alarmed by what is taking place,” said Rep. The hearing included testimony from several students, parents and faculty members. To see more, visit Michigan Radio.The House Oversight Committee held a hearing Thursday on efforts to limit discussion of history, race, and LGBTQ+ issues in classrooms in several states.
![house oversight house oversight](https://republican-win.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/house-oversight-readies-subpoenas-for-white-house-aides-personal-email-text-messages.jpg)
#House oversight full#
The legislation now heads to the full House of Representatives for consideration.Ĭopyright 2022 Michigan Radio. That is a good thing,” committee chair Steve Johnson (R-Wayland Twp) said. “It is our intention to try to make FOIA as easily accessible to everyday Michiganders so that way government is open and transparent. Package supporters said they’ve worked to address worries local government groups had about the legislation without weakening it. Briefly describing that there’s a record of a mental health investigation or briefly describing a rape kit? Those are problematic things and so I think we need to be a little bit more careful,” Bosworth said. “Briefly describing, you know, an appraisal? Not so bad. She said that’s the most concerning part of the package for her.
![house oversight house oversight](https://fedscoopwp-media.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/23173105/5690591614_9d44b65827_z-2.jpg)
Under the proposed package, officials would have to acknowledge a requested record’s existence, describe it, and explain why access to it was denied.ĭeena Bosworth is with the Michigan Association of Counties. “Being the FOIA coordinator is not their main job so dropping everything to respond to a FOIA request when it is brought in is not realistic in most places,” Rigterink said. Michigan’s FOIA doesn’t apply to individual lawmakers.ĭuring Thursday’s meeting, Jennifer Rigterink, of the Michigan Municipal League, pointed out many local FOIA coordinators have multiple duties. “My frustration is that, again, this is another standard placed on local governments that we don’t put on ourselves,” Yaroch said. Jeff Yaroch (R-Richmond) said he supports transparency in local government. But lawmakers had some hesitations their work wasn’t done. The legislation received wide support within the House Oversight Committee Thursday. “We are at a perilous moment for our country and I think everything we can do to increase government transparency, to increase modeling trustworthy behavior to the voters is absolutely imperative,” LaGrand said. David LaGrand (D-Grand Rapids) said the package is “incredibly important.” It would create fines for when a named reason isn’t also included in the written denial. The legislation also works to prevent officials from citing new reasons for denying a request in court. The package would require state agencies and local governments to acknowledge receipt of a Freedom of Information Act request within a couple of business days. Bills that would add more transparency requirements for state agencies and local governments made it out of the Michigan House Oversight Committee Thursday.